Warm introductions, licensing strategy, and government pathways — priced by scope, paid by retainer, never by percentage. Advisory clients receive no advantage in Fibonacci Standards assessment, and we say so in writing.
Counterparties found in the field, vetted through seven gates before any name is exposed.
FAA Parts 413, 415, 420, 433 and 450. Mission authorisation support for novel in-space activity.
SBIR / STTR routing, defence solicitations, NASA vehicles, prime and supplier teaming.
Warm introductions on mutual consent, infrastructure and facility advisory.
Advisory clients receive no advantage in assessment. Contingent compensation is disqualifying. Determinations are made by a committee with an independent majority we cannot overrule. Every relationship is disclosed on the face of the record.
Referral, inbound, or a conference relationship.
One working session, unpaid. Understanding the actual blocker, not the stated one.
Fixed-fee proposal with a defined outcome. Never contingent.
Weekly contact minimum until the outcome lands.
The Office of Space Commerce's mission authorisation pilot has an expression-of-interest window open now. Most operators have never filed a novel-authorisation application. This is scoped, fixed-fee, and time-boxed to the filing deadline.
What this looks like →Never contingent on outcome, deal size, or whether you raise capital elsewhere.
Start a conversation